The Management of the Judicial Service has appealed to the leadership of the Judicial Service Staff Association of Ghana (JUSAG) and all staff of the Judicial Service to resume work in the interest of the Ghanaian public amid an impasse over the 2026 salary review.
In a memorandum dated October 31, 2026, and signed by the Judicial Secretary, Musah Ahmed, Management acknowledged the frustrations of staff over the unresolved salary review but assured them that their concerns were being treated with the seriousness they deserved.
The appeal comes as the Judicial Service Management engages relevant government stakeholders in what it describes as high-level, good-faith negotiations aimed at resolving the disagreement.
Management said it remained committed to securing a fair and sustainable outcome that recognises the contributions of staff to the effective functioning of the Judicial Service.
It, however, urged JUSAG leadership and members to consider the broader national interest and return to their respective posts while negotiations continue.
According to the memorandum, the continued absence of judicial staff could undermine the administration of justice and place additional burdens on citizens who depend on the courts for the protection of their rights and the resolution of disputes.
“The Judicial Service is the bedrock upon which our nation’s rule of law rests,” the statement said, stressing that every staff member, from the registry to the courtroom, performs an indispensable role in ensuring the delivery of justice.
Management further cautioned that disruptions to court operations affect vulnerable persons, accused persons, families and other citizens seeking justice or redress.
It also reminded staff of their constitutional obligations to the people of Ghana, in whose name justice is administered.
The Judicial Service Management reiterated its commitment to resolving the impasse as quickly and equitably as possible, urging all parties to maintain cooperation and place the needs of the Ghanaian public above other considerations.
The memorandum was copied to the Chief Justice, the Deputy Judicial Secretary, and the President, Judges and Magistrates Association.
